Concise quality standard references – HEARRING

INNOVATION THROUGH SCIENCE

Literature and References

Children

CONCISE QUALITY STANDARDS FOR
COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION IN CHILDREN

1. Vincenti V, Bacciu A, Guida M, et al. Pediatric cochlear implantation: an update. Ital J Pediatr. 2014 Sep 2;40:72.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25179127/

2. Sharma SD, Cushing SL, Papsin BC, et al. Hearing and speech benefits of cochlear implantation in children: A review of the literature. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol . 2020 Jun;133:109984.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32203759/

3. Sbeih F, Bouzaher MH, Appachi S, et al. Safety of Cochlear Implantation in Children 12 Months or Younger: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;167(6):912-922.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34982600/

4. Uecker C, Szczepek A, Olze H. Pediatric Bilateral Cochlear Implantation: Simultaneous Versus Sequential Surgery. Otol Neurotol. 2019 Apr;40(4):e454-e460.

Pediatric Bilateral Cochlear Implantation: Simultaneous Versus Sequential Surgery – PubMed (nih.gov)

Based on: HEARRING Group. 2017. Quality standards for cochlear implantation in infants, children, and young adults. Based on: Martin J, Raine CH. 2013. Quality standards for cochlear implantation in children and young adults. Cochlear Implants Int. 14 Suppl 2:S13-20.

Quality_Standards_for_Cochlear_Implantation_in_Infants_Children_and_Young_Adults.pdf (hearring.com)

CONCISE QUALITY STANDARDS FOR
(RE)HABILITATION IN CHILDREN

1. De Raeve L, Cumpăt MC, van Loo A, et al. Quality Standard for Rehabilitation of Young Deaf Children Receiving Cochlear Implants. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023. 24;59(7):1354.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37512167/

2. Martin J. Quality standards for (re)habilitation. Cochlear Implants Int. 2013. 14 Suppl 2:S34-8.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23764330/

3. Moeller MP, Carr G, Seaver L, et al. Best practices in family-centered early intervention for children who are deaf or hard of hearing: An international consensus statement. Journal of deaf studies and deaf education. 2013. 18(4), 429-445.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24030911/

CONCISE QUALITY STANDARDS FOR
MINIMAL OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS IN CHILDREN

1. Mertens G, Hofkens A. Minimal outcome measurements in paediatric cochlear implant users: a consensus paper. B-ENT. 2021. 17(2):110-120.

http://www.b-ent.be/Content/files/sayilar/98/110-120(1).pdf

Adults

CONCISE QUALITY STANDARDS FOR
COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION IN ADULTS

1. Carlson ML. Cochlear implantation in adults. Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 16;382(16):1531-1542.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32294347/

2. Van de Heyning P, Atlas M, Baumgartner WD, et al. The reliability of hearing implants: report on the type and incidence of cochlear implant failures. Cochlear Implants Int. 2020 Jul;21(4):228-237.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32156201/

3. Ehrmann-Müller D, Shehata-Dieler W, Kurz A, et al. Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Children: Long-Term Outcome in the Adult Population With Special Emphasis on the Bilateral Benefit. Otol Neurotol. 2021 Jul 1;42(6):824-831.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33591069/

4. Mertens G, Andries E, Claes AJ, et al. Cognitive Improvement After Cochlear Implantation in Older Adults With Severe or Profound Hearing Impairment: A Prospective, Longitudinal, Controlled, Multicenter Study. Ear Hear. 2021 May/Jun;42(3):606-614.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33055579/

5. Lassaletta L, Calvino M, Sanchez-Cuadrado I, et al. Using Generic and Disease-Specific Measures to Assess Quality of Life before and after 12 Months of Hearing Implant Use: A Prospective, Longitudinal, Multicenter, Observational Clinical Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 22;19(5):2503.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35270201/

6. Nasresfahani A, Dasdar S, Kianfar N, et al. Music Appreciation of Cochlear Implant Users versus Normal Hearing Individuals. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 May;34(122):171-179.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35655538/

Based on: HEARRING Group. 2017. Quality standards for cochlear implantation in adults and older adults. Based on: Mueller J, Raine CH. 2013. Quality standards for adult cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants Int. 14 Suppl 2:S6-12.

Quality_Standards_for_Cochlear_Implantation_in_Adults_and_Older_Adults.pdf (hearring.com)

CONCISE QUALITY STANDARDS FOR
(RE)HABILITATION IN ADULTS

1. Martin J. Quality standards for (re)habilitation. Cochlear Implants Int. 2013. 14 Suppl 2:S34-8.

Quality standards for (re)habilitation – PubMed (nih.gov)

2. Bruschke S, Zeh R, Baumann U, et et al. Frankfurter Konzept einer stationären Cochleaimplantat-Frührehabilitation : Untersuchung zur Durchführbarkeit als Anschlussheilbehandlung [Frankfurt concept of early inpatient rehabilitation after cochlear implant treatment : Feasibility for aftercare. German version]. HNO. 2024. 72(6), 412–422.

[Frankfurt concept of early inpatient rehabilitation after cochlear implant treatment : Feasibility for aftercare. German version] – PubMed (nih.gov)

3. Carter JM, Killan CF, & Ridgwell JJ. Telehealth rehabilitation for adults with cochlear implants in response to the Covid-19 pandemic: platform selection and case studies. Cochlear implants international. 2022. 23(1), 43–51.

Telehealth rehabilitation for adults with cochlear implants in response to the Covid-19 pandemic: platform selection and case studies – PubMed (nih.gov)

4. Völter C, Schirmer C, Stöckmann C, et al. Computerbasiertes Hörtraining in der Hörrehabilitation Erwachsener nach Cochleaimplantation [Computer-based auditory training for hearing rehabilitation of adult cochlear implant users]. HNO. 2020. 68(11), 817–827.

[Computer-based auditory training for hearing rehabilitation of adult cochlear implant users] – PubMed (nih.gov)

CONCISE QUALITY STANDARDS FOR
MINIMAL OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS IN ADULTS

Based on: Kleine Punte A, Van de Heyning P. Quality standards for minimal outcome measurements in adults and children. Cochlear Implants Int. 2013. 14 Suppl 2:S39-42.

Quality_Standards_for_Minimal_Measurements_in_Adults_and_Children.pdf (hearring.com)